On the last anniversary of the Her Majesty’s
coronation, yours truly wrote an article concerning the Queens’ coronation
ritual (see http://jamaicatory.blogspot.com/2013/06/rites-of-coronation.html ),
the same ritual used to crown English, Scottish, British and Commonwealth
monarchs over the long centuries of the monarchy’s existence, one of the points
that came out in the article was that our sovereign was actually one of the few
monarchs that are still officially crowned, this was noted due to several
factors such as the fact that many monarchies were abolished over the last century
alone (most of which were deposed in illegal coup d’états) or the fact that
most remaining monarchs have chosen to abandon the coronation ritual altogether
and instead opt for a civil inauguration (a word that should even not be uttered in monarchist circles) or
enthronement ceremonies.
The coronation service is not just a civil or state
ceremony but more importantly it is a religious ceremony which underline the
sovereign’s role as Defender of the Faith and Head of the Church (of England),
the coronation is significant of that age old belief that the sovereign rules
by birthright because it is the will of God himself not because it is the will
of the people, a quite appropriate way to put it considering that the monarchy
is a hereditary institution that not an elected one. This belief is best exemplified
by the title of the Queen herself as used in this Realm, Elizabeth the Second,
By the Grace of God, of Jamaica and of Her Other Realms and Territories, Queen,
Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith. Other Commonwealth Realms use their
own unique version of the royal style and title and even though outside of the
United Kingdom she is not seen as Head of the Church, all Commonwealth Realms have
one thing in Common in that they acknowledge her as being their rightful Queen
solely by the Grace of God, hence it is most appropriate that a religious coronation
should be used to acknowledge this fact.
It has come up lately in the news however that
certain groups have now taken issue with the timeless tradition by claiming
that a the ceremony is a “violation of human rights”, they have the audacity to
claim that the ceremony is outdated and there is need to replace it with a
ceremony that appeals to more multicultural society. What a load of rubbish, I’ve
seen leftist come up with some ridiculous claims in the past but my goodness,
this one baffles even me, where these liberals come up with these bizarre
sinister conspiracy theories only heaven knows. Human Rights is a much abused
word these days, leftist use it to justify everything they do, it’s getting
sickening. How can God’s earth can a coronation ceremony be seen to violate
human rights? No one is being abused or being enslaved or being massacred,
persecuted, and discriminated against or anything even remotely close to what
the average man understand human rights to be. They have to nerve to talk about
freedom of religion?, the Queen might be head of the Church of England but that
in no way is a barrier to religious freedom, every subject of the Crown in all
16 realms and their dependencies are free to practice their religion, so in
truth, the monarchy guarantees freedom of religion, which is much more than I
can say about non-religious states such as North Korea, where it has recently
come to light that people are now being executed simply for owning a Bible, or
the days of the Soviet Union, an atheist state which had an agenda to eliminate
all religion and replace it with an atheist one world government .
The justification given by this secularist is that
they are trying to promote religious freedom, what nonsense, everyone knows
that the only kind of religion that atheist groups are interested in is no
religion whatsoever, and what they promote as religious freedom is in fact a
cover for their true agenda which is to abolish all religion (the same agenda
promoted by every evil communist regime to ever exist).
Also disturbing is the fact that the courts may or
may not be expected to make rulings in this case concerning aspects of the
coronation, which begs the question, what authority does any court have to make
rulings on such a sacred aspect of the
monarchy?, the Queen is fount of justice, she is the one who appoints
judges, all judges must swear allegiance to her as sovereign and dole out
justice in her name, how dare any judge presume to have the right to make a
ruling on Her Majesty’s person, this
only brings to mind the kangaroo court of 1649 that traitorously brought their own
sovereign to trial in which King Charles I rightfully asked
“Now, I would know by what authority – I
mean lawful- but I would know by what authority I was brought from thence and
carried from place to place, and I know not what. And when I know what lawful authority, I
shall answer. Remember, I am your King –
your lawful King”.
This is nothing if not sacrilege, for years many
have been arguing that the principle of democracy means that the monarchy must
remain above politics, yet when others used underhanded political tactics to interfere
with the Crown no one bats an eye, by politicising the coronation ceremony these
people attempt to bring one of the great timeless traditions of the
British/Commonwealth monarchy into disrepute. While it is not inevitable it would come as no surprise if it were to be discovered that the true agenda of these
liberals and secularist was to end the monarchy but instead of doing so outright,
they do it quite subtly little by little, if they can come up with an argument
to abolish the coronation, what is stop them from coming up with arguments to
abolish the monarchy?, it’s the same principle and these ominous persons must be
stopped in their tracks before it is far too late
No comments:
Post a Comment