Thursday 27 February 2014

Uganda's Dilemma

One must have been living under a rock to not hear about the latest moves made by the government of Uganda against the LGBT people living in their country. Recently the Ugandan Parliament passed a bill making homosexuality a crime punishable by life imprisonment, this bill was later signed into law by President Yoweri Museven. This new basically puts not only every Ugandan LGBT individual but also those who advocate on their behalf at risk because now the state is authorized to adopt the most draconian methods to deal with such persons. This is a rather unique situation indeed even in many countries where gay rights are not recognized this method may seem a bit over the top, in an earlier post I had once stated that due to Putin’s anti-gay  stance, Russia might one day rival Jamaica as the most homophobic country in the world that goes to shows that even the best of us must eat our words at times because clearly Uganda has surpassed Jamaica and Russia to become the new most homophobic nation on earth.

                


Ever since the passage of this bill by Uganda there have been many different views weighing on from different sides of the political spectrum, Ranging from the far right who totally support the measures of the Ugandan government, to the more moderate conservatives, who agree with the idea of a nation standing up for its traditional beliefs and not being influenced by the LGBT agenda pushed by certain liberal western countries but at the same time they also feel that the methods taken to enforce this new law are a bit extreme while at the far end of the spectrum of the leftist who of course are totally flabbergasted by what they describe as a ghastly violation of human rights.
                                  


In all fairness, I think I stand  closer to  the  moderate right on this issue. It is no secret that the Jamaican Tory has never been a fan of the so called “gay rights” movement and anything that will halt the spread of their worldwide influence will certainly have my support. But that still leaves one important question that I’m sure a lot of moderates must be asking themselves right now, “does the ends really justify the means?”, sure the President’s intentions may not be all that bad his methods  can only be described as draconian, how far will this go?, what will be the end result of this? No one knows for sure. To illustrate my meaning earlier this week it came out that a Uganda magazine printed a list of the top 200 gay persons living in the Republic, even some persons who have not previously identified themselves among that group are now on that list,  I cannot help but wonder why this was done. Almost everything else I can understand but this was just plain bizarre as now 200 people will be living with a target on their back every single day that they remain in the country, that was most certainly not a smart move on their part, as mass killings could end of being the result, and I’m not so sure that was the intention of the Ugandan government.

                      

Then of course there is the whole matter of the reaction of the international community, not surprisingly the US and several European countries as well as the liberal media houses and human rights groups that dominate them wasted no time in vilifying the Ugandan government, especially Mr. Museven, several countries have already cut or threatened to cut aid to Uganda. It is no secret that US President Obama is on a mission to spread gay rights all over the world, only a few months ago he found himself in the middle of a row with several African leaders over the very same issue while on a tour of the continent. So naturally this latest development has placed a serious dent in his plan, no wonder he is fuming.  But as I said before regarding Russia and I will repeat the same with regards to Uganda, a sovereign state has every right to enact laws that it thinks are in the best interest of its people and no foreign influence be it governmental or private lobby group has any real authority to dictate to the duly elected government of an independent country what it’s policy should or should not be, that right belongs solely to the citizens of said country.

                        


Before closing  I must say that I find President Museven to be a rather brave man, few would ever dare give assent to such a bill regardless of their personal views for the sheer fact that there are many factors at stake, Uganda is hardly one of the most advanced countries in the world and for its leaders to forego monetary aid in order to stand up for what they truly believe in takes a whole lot of guts.  In a world where it seems as though the LGBT agenda is taking over everywhere it’s refreshing to see that there are those who still refused to be bullied into acceptance but rather choose to follow its own path. For too long now when certain persons (especially celebrities) find it convenient to come out the closet, they are being hailed as being brave and having guts,  in truth however since so many of them are doing it nowadays I would hardly call it brave or unique but rather little more than a publicity stunt to gain more attention. It’s when a person (or in this case a country) chooses to stand up and defy the crowds, defy expectations and freely follow his God-given conscience regardless of the differing opinion that is what truly makes one bold and distinctive, this boldness is exactly what the Government of Uganda displayed with this latest law. 

Wednesday 5 February 2014

Let Traditional Throne Speech Remain

As I sat here considering what to write about in this latest post, a friend of mine brought some rather disturbing news and I feel compelled to share. It has to do with a proposal put forward by a certain member of parliament to have the standing orders of parliament amended so instead of opening parliament with the customary  throne speech, it would be replace by his own artificial creation “people’s speech”.  The Member of Parliament in question goes by the name Raymond Pryce, who represents the constituency of North East St Elizabeth. Before I even get into the issue at hand let me first talk about the man himself. Pryce is well known for his radical views which places him squarely left of the political divide, being a first term MP he’s a newcomer to the political scene after being placed to contest what is considered to be a safe seat  for the People’s National Party less than a month before the 2011 general elections. Although he hardly did much to demonstrate why he should be elected given his short notice nomination he was elected solely on the fact he was representing the interest of the PNP, so much  for meritocracy. Since his election Pryce has been a rather controversial man, known for his repeated acts of disrespect towards God (he can’t even quote the Lord’s Prayer correctly) , the Queen, his fellow MPs and even conservative elder statesmen such as former Prime Minister Edward Seaga. He is also known for advocacy on issues of republicanism and legalization of marijuana and other pro-left wing issues, that about sums up who this man really is.

                  



As for his proposal let me categorically say from now that such a notion is unacceptable and unthinkable. It was first proposed by Pryce in 2012 who had asked for it to be done in time for the 2012 speech, fortunately then nobody else in the House took up the debate and the topic soon died, 2012 and 2013 both passed with the Governor-General delivering his traditional Throne Speech and is expected to do the same later down in the year, imagine my absolute shock and dismay to learn after all this time that the issue is still on the agenda, what could the Cabinet even be thinking that they could want to give this suggestion a second thought?, I mean seriously, one would have thought that when the Prime Minister and her colleagues meet at Jamaica House they would actually be considering issues that of most pressing concern to the nation and not that trivial nonsense, which is the only thing a intellectually deprived socialist like Pryce could actually consider as his main contribution to parliament instead of doing what he’s being paid to do by representing the interest of his constituents, the people of North East St Elizabeth deserve better than the likes of him for a MP anyway , and the people of Jamaica certainly don’t waste their time thinking about whether the parliament should be opened with a Throne Speech or a People’s Speech so why the fuss all of a sudden?.


                 


Anti-Monarchism is a key element of leftism in this country and this is just another way for them  to continue their republicanism by stealth  as part of an overall agenda to subvert the constitution of this land and indoctrinate us into believing their propaganda. Pryce claims that the speech should be renamed people’s speech because it shows the primacy of the Jamaican people, however the very fact that Pryce actually proposes the change is enough reason why it should not be done, here's why. If Pryce really did have the interest of the people at heart then he wouldn't be wasting his time making petty propositions but rather he would making proposals that would be of some actual use to the people of Jamaica or at the very least to the people of his constituency, this proposal however is nothing more than an ego booster for him, that’s why most of the other MPs didn’t even bother to debate the issue in Parliament

                     


The Throne speech is so named because it comes from the Throne, it was written by the minsters of Her Majesty’s Government and is read by Her Majesty’s Representative the Governor-General, I don’t see what is so hard about that to comprehend, and while some may be tempted agree with Pryce I will not be so quick to jump on the bandwagon, some people are often fooled by politicians claiming to be on the “side of the people’  nothing demonstrates this more than the last general elections when the PNP used the slogan of "people power" to trick many persons into buying into their publicity stunt, however  former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher warned that when   “Socialists cry "Power to the people", and raise the clenched fist as they say it.  We all know what they really mean - power over people, power to the state." , she was right on the money and  that certainly seems to be the same trend here.


                           


Pryce can argue about symbolism all he wants but the truth of the matter is Jamaica’s constitution makes it plain that we are a constitutional monarchy and as such our ceremonies and symbols should reflect this, the Queen  is the very  personification of the state itself because the Crown is sovereign and as such the use of the term  "people's speech" to open parliament  would be highly unconstitutional  and as  minsters of the Crown sworn to uphold and defend the constitution the Cabinet should not even be considering this treasonous proposal  , instead they should leave well enough alone as this country have far more urgent issues to deal with instead to trying to distract public attention with this ludicrous neo-Marxist  pro-republican rhetoric.