The annual
conference of the Jamaica Labour Party has come and gone and I’m sure many of
my regular readers must be wondering what happened to the review they have been
promised by yours truly. Well here’s the final piece in this entire JLP vs JLP
saga, for those of you do not know, the leadership race has come and gone and
incumbent party leader Andrew Holness has managed to successfully defend his
position against challenger Audley “Man-a-Yard” Shaw, with delegates choosing
to give Holness 2,704 votes while
another 2,012 voted in favour of Shaw, without a doubt it was clear who won the
day and yours truly was one of those was fortunate to be on site at the
National Arena in this historic day in the life of the party, a day which also
has great significant for the continuance of the political right winged
movement in Jamaica.
So now that
the elections are over one would have thought that the JLP would now get its
act together, and prepare to take on the left winged People’s National Party in
order to drive them out of Jamaica House come next general election, but
unfortunately the fued continues as was demonstrated by actions taken by both
sides this week. Upon being reelected as leader of the party, one of Holness’
first act was to reshuffle his shadow cabinet effectively placing Audley Shaw and
all his supporters on the back benches of Gordon House and if that were not
enough it emerged that Holness controversially sent pre-written and undated resignation
letters of certain Senators to the Governor-General for his approval. According
to sources, Holness had asked all opposition Senators to write undated
resignation letters and submit them to him for safekeeping which he would in
turn submit to Sir Patrick Allen (the Governor-General) at a time he sees fit.
How does
something like that work?, let me explain, the Constitution of Jamaica stipulates that the Upper House should consist of 21 senators, 13 from the
government and 8 from the opposition, all of which are appointed by the Crown
on the advice of the Prime Minister and Opposition Leader. The controversy in
this case comes from the fact that Holness upon winning the leadership
challenge had asked certain persons to politely step aside and give him a free
hand to assemble his team, they refused so he took more drastic measures. Since
this incident occurred there is a raging debate going on as to whether or not
the leader did the correct thing, on one hand some accused Holness of being
dictatorial and vindictive by seeking to ruin all those who had opposed him,
such persons accuse him of violating the constitution and also brings the
independence and integrity of the senate
as an institution into disrepute. On the other hand there are those
who says that the leader is better off starting afresh with new faces, it’s
only appropriate seeing as his recent
win has given him a new mandate and it would be a backward step for him
to continue with the same old faces especially since some of those former
senators were the very ones who had opposed Holness and supported what they saw
as Shaw’s attempted coup d’état, they had gambled everything and lost, the only
decent thing for them to do was to graciously step aside.
While I may
not totally agree with the removal of Shaw and his supporters from both the
shadow cabinet and the senate, I see the point Holness’ supporters are trying
to make here, it kinds of reminds me of the famous line from the HBO Television
series “Game of Thrones” where a
character uttered the now famous quotation “Whenever you play the Game of
Thrones, you either win or die, there is no middle ground”, it seems to me
like Shaw and his crew though they’ve
already lost in this game , they’re not ready to die just yet, this was
exemplified in a letter sent by Shaw to Holness the day of his election loss
outlining a set of demands that must be met before he will ever accept any post
in a shadow cabinet led by Holness. I’m not entirely sure what his motivation
was for doing so but it certainly does not seem like Shaw is ready to gracefully
accept his loss and move one, in one of his campaign speeches Shaw had promised
to be the worst nightmare for Prime Minister Portia Simpson Miller if elected,
one can only hope that now he has been rejected, he would not turn into Andrew
Holness’ worst nightmare instead.
Then there
is the whole matter of whether or not Holness’ actions in sending the undated
letters to Kings House was even legal. From all accounts regardless of all the sentiments
about independence of the senate, legislative review, separation of powers and whatever other
argument some persons are coming up with, in truth there is no legal basis to
claim that Holness’ actions were illegal, uncalled for maybe but certainly not unconstitutional,
in any organization public or private, it is understood that the person who
hires you (or someone else in a similar position later on) also has the power
to fire you, hence the reason why he could ask senators to step aside but not members of Parliament who are directly elected by their constituents. The 8 opposition senators were appointed on Holness’ advice and so
why can’t have them removed just as easily? And as for the senate as an
independent body, Where did they get that from?, the Governor-General cannot
appoint a Senator on his own, he must wait to
be advised by either the Prime Minister or Opposition Leader as to who
to appoint, some Caribbean countries like Trinidad and Barbados have
independent senators which are nonaligned to a political party, Jamaica does
not, so tell me again what kind of independent senate are they talking about.
There is an
old saying that you can’t eat your cake and have it yet it seems that’s exactly
what Shaw and his supporters are intent on doing, while there are some who
accuse Holness and his supporters of promoting disunity in the JLP even after the
race is over, that’s an unfair observation considering that the same thing can be
said of the Shaw Team, quite frankly in this saga, I think there is more than
enough blame to go around on all sides.
I think the actions of the Leader are very worrying and indicates some level of dictatorial rule, which will not suffice in the JLP. I think Mr. Shaw was very right in his own way to stand against what he felt were attempts by the Leader to sideline persons who did not support him. Arthur Williams did not vote in the leadership race so it is unsure as to why he was been removed.
ReplyDelete