Sunday 3 February 2013

On the matter of abdication


Early last week  Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands announced to the citizens of her Kingdom and the entire world that she intends to abdicate on Queen’s Day in April  and hand over the crown to her son Willem Alexander, Crown Prince of the Netherlands and Prince of Orange making him the first Dutch King in 123 years, the last time the Netherlands has had a male monarch was in 1890 when King Willem III died, since then the Dutch people have had a succession of Queens, first Wilhelmina, then Juliana and finally Beatrix all of whom abdicated to facilitate the next generation after reigning for a long period.

                        

 Within the Commonwealth Realms there have been speculations as to whether or not our Queen  Elizabeth II will follow the example of her Dutch counterpart and abdicate in favour of her son Charles, Prince of Wales after all she has been on the throne for twice as long as  Queen Beatrix and the Prince of Wales has been in waiting much longer the Prince of Orange, in fact he is the longest waiting heir apparent of all time beating the record previously set by his great-great-grandfather King Edward VII who ascended the throne at 59 years old. Despite these facts the Queen shows no sign of wanting to slow down despite celebrating her Diamond Jubilee last year, in fact this week the Queen will mark 61 years on the throne inching closer yet to the record set by her great-great-grandmother Queen Victoria and given the fact that longevity of life is a common trait among her female ancestors there are speculations by many that she will in fact eventually become the longest reigning sovereign of all time in the history of the Commonwealth therefore abdication is certainly not in the cards at this time.

                                      
It is no secret that Queen Elizabeth views her job as a lifetime commitment and takes her coronation oath very seriously as it was a vow solemnly made to both God and to her loyal subjects , even before her ascension she has committed her life to duty and service, who can forget those now famous words she spoke on her 21st birthday in South Africa so long ago “my whole life whether it be long or short, shall be dedicated to your service and  to the service of our great imperial family to which we all belong”  that sentence alone should have been enough to dispel any notions whatsoever that the Queen would abdicate her responsibilities but some continue to speculate on this matter.
                          

To be frank Dutch tradition is totally different from those used in the British Commonwealth , whereas in the Netherlands the monarch is actually expected to abdicate after reigning for a long period of time though this period is totally at the Monarch’s  discretion. In the Commonwealth abdication has a very negative connotation, who could forget the Abdication crisis of 1936 involving the Queen’s uncle King Edward VIII, who gave up his birthright to marry an American divorcee we surely don't want a repeat of that incident, here in the Commonwealth we expect our monarch to reign for life, if they get too old or too ill to carry out their daily duties then a regent may be appointed as was done when King George III was declared mentally unstable in 1811, his heir (who later succeeded him as King George IV) became regent, still final authority still rest with the Sovereign as long has he or she is alive. 
                                      
One must also remember that the Dutch concept of monarchy is totally different from ours. In the Netherlands and some our European countries the monarch is now regarded as a citizen (though this was not always so) and as such the monarch goes through an investiture or enthronement ceremony rather than a coronation. In the Commonwealth Realms this is no so, our Head of State is not a citizen but she is sovereign and we are her subjects ,it would have been a very sticky situation for her to be citizen of 16 sovereign countries, inherently she could only be a citizen of one and a foreigner to the rest. This is why she is anointed and crowned as our sovereign lady in her coronation ceremony, she is the living embodiment of the state and all its authority, sovereignty does not rest with the people, it rest with her and as such she cannot afford to give up the throne whenever she likes but instead is bound to stay true to her coronation oath. King Edward VIII had a lucky escape since he abdicated before he got a chance to be anointed or to take the coronation oath (regardless he was still king), or else his position would have been a much more precarious one, had he been crowned he maybe would have felt more obliged to stay infuriating his ministers even more and could possibly lead to another king being involuntarily deposed by parliament like what happened to King James II in 1688, that would have been an even more unpleasant scenario had it happened that way.
                                      

Queen Beatrix is possibly the most well loved and loved respected figure throughout her Kingdom but now she’s calling it quits , but Queen Elizabeth II shows no sign of wanting to follow suit, she intends to reign till her last breath which really and truly is the monarchist way of doing things, I personally hope to see her stick around at least long enough to beat the previous record set by Queen Victoria and become the longest reigning Queen ever in Commonwealth history. 

No comments:

Post a Comment